https://preview.redd.it/rjfk226r2izd1.png?width=1200&format=png&auto=webp&s=87bd110d414df60e36f35f747241df88fa904fd3
TL;DR:
Just analyzed Lido's validator data and found something crazy 99.4% vs 97.5% effectiveness = ~0.1 ETH difference per year (32 ETH stake) Not just simple math – rewards actually compound through multiple mechanisms Finally understand why DVT validators consistently earn more 🎯
Yo! 👋 Fellow ETH stakers,
Been going down a rabbit hole analyzing validator data (because that's what we do on Sunday nights, right? 😅). Found some mind-blowing stuff about how effectiveness REALLY impacts rewards.
The nerdy stuff first (I promise it gets interesting):
Basic staking math:
Max theoretical APY = [base reward/epoch * epochs/year * 32 attestations] + block proposals = (4*10^-7 * 82,125 * 32) + ~0.5% ≈ 4.2%
But here's where it gets spicy 🌶️
Real rewards are affected by:
Attestations (the bread & butter, ~95% of rewards) Block proposals (the juicy 5%) Sync committee rewards MEV (the cherry on top)
Looking at actual data from Lido's SimpleDVT validators:
DVT validators: 99.4% effectiveness → 4.06% APY Average validators: 97.52% effectiveness → 3.74% APY
"But wait," I hear you say, "that's just a 1.88% difference!"
NOPE. Here's the real impact on 32 ETH:
3.74% = 1.197 ETH/year 4.06% = 1.299 ETH/year Difference = 0.102 ETH 🤑
Why such a big difference? Because when you miss attestations:
You lose the base reward Get slapped with penalties Miss sync committee opportunities Network delays snowball
The most interesting part? This data is from SSV-powered validators on Lido. Turns out distributed validation isn't just fancy tech – it's actually putting more ETH in people's wallets.
Anyone else tracking their effectiveness? What numbers are you seeing? Drop your stats below!
submitted by /u/yutingzhang [comments]
Source link
